Although not widely recognized, the passive beamforming topology discussed here is commonly used in the RF field.
Part 1 covered the basics of electronically steering an antenna beam and the Butler matrix; this section delves deeper into the topic.
Q: The Butler passive setup appears simpler; why isn’t it universally adopted?
A: The Butler matrix serves as a passive, beamforming-feed network for phased-array antenna elements but faces challenges in achieving wide bandwidth and precise phase control due to component limitations.
The bandwidth and performance of the Butler matrix are heavily influenced by the design of its passive components, interconnected via transmission lines. As the matrix’s input and output ports increase, so does the complexity and length of interconnections.
Each component must support wide bandwidth with the necessary phase accuracy, and errors in electrical path lengths must be carefully controlled. Any deviations in these characteristics result in significant phase variations across a broad frequency range, posing significant technical hurdles.
Growing Interest in the Butler Matrix
Q: Why is there a surge in interest and adoption of the Butler matrix?
A: Extensive efforts are underway to enhance beamforming technology capabilities for applications like 5G, Wi-Fi 6E, IoT, autonomous vehicles, mobile communication, satellite communication, testing, and radar.
Recent advancements in wideband Butler matrices involve improvements in wideband hybrids, passive phase shifters, and precise phase-matching of cable assemblies. Additionally, simulation tools, optimization techniques, and manufacturing processes have advanced.
Q: When was the Butler matrix concept first introduced?
A: The concept was pioneered in the early 1960s by Jesse Butler and Ralph Lowe, presenting an innovative distribution network for creating fixed beams in array antennas. Initially known as the “Sanders beam-forming matrix,” it later became synonymous with the Butler matrix, revolutionizing large array designs in defense radars.
The original work took place at Sanders Associates in New Hampshire, known for its expertise in complex circuit assemblies. The matrix’s nomenclature shift from Sanders to Butler remains a mystery.
Q: At what frequencies is the Butler matrix typically utilized?
A: While it is commonly used in the 1-10 GHz range, it has also found applications at higher frequencies. However, delivering and maintaining performance at higher frequencies pose greater challenges due to subtle parasitic effects and parameter shifts.
Q: What are the key performance metrics for the Butler matrix?
A: Performance metrics include return loss, insertion loss, amplitude flatness, and phase deviation, similar to other RF components. Measuring these metrics is complex due to the numerous ports and specialized instrumentation required. Higher-order matrices exhibit higher losses due to additional components and longer lines.
Customization and Availability
Q: What design analysis tools are available?
A: Rigorous analytical analysis, modeling, and electromagnetic field simulation tools are essential for evaluating RF designs, including the Butler matrix. Advanced RF design resources offer in-depth analysis of the matrix.
Q: Is custom-building a Butler matrix recommended?
A: No, off-the-shelf Butler matrices are available from vendors like Ranatec, Krytar, Spectrum Control/APITech Weinschel, and MIcable. These vendors offer standard, semi-custom, and fully customized units operating up to 20 GHz.
A typical Butler matrix unit is illustrated in Figure 1, showcasing clear labeling and connectors.
![\"beamforming\"](\"https://www.5gtechnologyworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/fig1beamforming-300x240.jpg\")
Figure 1. Butler matrices are available from many vendors as standard packaged products, such as this unit in a case with labeled connectors and a phase table. (Image: Krytar)
Q: Is a microstrip design a viable alternative to discrete elements?
A: While microstrip offers a cost-effective solution for specific frequency, size, and power requirements, it necessitates a different approach to matrix components. Fabrication tolerances can be challenging at higher frequencies.
Microstrip may not be suitable for all Butler matrix applications, especially with numerous antenna elements. In such cases, waveguide technology, despite being costlier and bulkier, can deliver lower losses at higher frequencies and power levels.
Concluding Remarks
The Butler matrix presents an ingenious method for implementing a steerable antenna array using passive components. While it offers advantages over alternatives, it also has limitations. Since its inception in 1961, the matrix has been successfully integrated into various real-world systems.
References
The Butler Matrix and its Use for Beamforming and MIMO Testing, Everything RF, EverythingRF
Butler Matrix, Microwaves101
Butler Matrix, Wikipedia
Butler Matrices and RF Switches, Spectrum Control
Wideband Butler Matrices and Their Potential Applications, MIcable
Butler Matrix KBM9010180, Krytar
Related EE World Online content
Creating 5G massive MIMO: Part 1
Creating massive MIMO, part 2
How many types of radar are there?
Module simulates 8×8 MIMO for 5G testing
Difference between a waveguide and transmission line
VSWR and impedance, Part 6: Microstrip and stripline
